home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: guysmiley.blarg.net!usenet
- From: warrl@blarg.net (Warrl kyree Tale'sedrin)
- Newsgroups: alt.2600,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc,alt.destroy.microsoft,alt.fan.bill-gates,alt.wired,comp.infosystems.www.browsers.ms-windows,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.win95.setup,alt.sex.anal,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.adventure,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,comp.unix.unixware.misc
- Subject: Re: Will anyone buy NT?? (Yes - Intelligent People)
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 02:29:31 GMT
- Organization: None -- just look at my desk!
- Message-ID: <4gr5pi$2sl@guysmiley.blarg.net>
- References: <4ef48q$rik@news.iag.net> <Supersede.Dn3sy8.CsG@iquest.net> <312B0660.63F3@mts.se> <4ghi50$2ud@hp01.redwood.nl> <4gnp0l$n86@thetics.europa.com> <312F71AE.12C9@phidias.colorado.edu> <3130C485.10BB@siruis.com>
- Reply-To: warrl@blarg.net
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialup66.blarg.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- Gil Colgate <gcolgate@siruis.com> wrote:
-
- >Until NT supports less than 1 millisecond latency, support for direct access to hardware
- >acceleration, then I won't be using it. Most games will be written for '95... if they also run on
- >NT then I'd buy it. Until then, no.
-
- You will never buy an OS significantly more sophisticated than Windows
- 3.1. This requirement you claim to have, directly contradicts a
- requirement everyone actually does have: stability.
-
- Most games will be written for Win95, beginning in 1997 and ending in
- about 2000. After that, they'll be written for a *real* OS -- NT
- maybe, Unix maybe, and perhaps running the Win95 front end -- or
- they'll be written for dedicated game machines. Who knows, by then
- maybe Sega will produce a machine that is running Win95 behind the
- scenes... but probably they won't because their current OS is
- superior, being among other things more stable.
-
-